Very reluctantly, we are told, President Francois Holland was forced to order French troops to intervene in Mali, a former West African colony. There was no other way to ward off disaster, to prevent yet another failed African state from becoming a haven for terrorists linked to Al Qaeda. France had strong cultural, economic and military links to the region that couldn’t be ignored.
The risks of France’s vague, open-ended venture—which the
U.S. has already indicated it will support--are already being debated. But what
I find particularly ironic is that the country that has probably most to gain from
the intervention--is China.
Why?
Because, by thwarting the rebels’ drive, France and its
partners-to-be will be preserving the security not only of Mali’s rickety
regime, but of Mali’s neighbors as well, also former French colonies, none of
which can make a serious claim to stability.
But in every one of those countries, China does big business—in
several of them, very big business.
--In Niger,
for instance, where France has a program of military cooperation, a Chinese
company operates what is China’s largest uranium mine, at Azelik—breaking what
was a defacto monopoly on Niger’s
reserves once enjoyed by France.
China also runs a major oilfield and has signed a deal to
upgrade the country’s power supplies.
--In
Chad,
where per capital income is about $900 per year, the French have a large airforce base that is being used for their
offensive in Mali. The Chinese have a different kind of operation: their
national petroleum corporation is backing a $1 billion dollar project, to lay 300
kilometers of pipelines from oilfields in Southern Chad to a Chinese-built
refinery near the capital, Ndjamena. The refinery is jointly owned by China and
Chad. China is also building a new international airport nearby.
- The Ivory
Coast, once a jewel of the French colonial crown, also has a French
military base, and lots of French business interests. But just two days before President
Holland intervened in Mali, it was announced in Abidjan, that China and the
Ivory Coast had agreed on a massive $500 million low-interest loan from China’s
Export Import bank—to finance the construction of a hydropower station-- by a Chinese
engineering firm--that will be the largest in the country and will export power
to neighboring countries.
China
is also drilling for oil in the Cameroon, building an airport and port in
Mauritania, importing cotton from Burkina Faso, making huge deals for iron ore
in Guinea and Sierra Leone, while building schools, hospitals, stadiums, not to
mention railway lines all over the continent.
So why is China willing to make such massive gambles in a
part of the world where governments seem to change from week to week, and huge
countries like Mali, which used to be considered one of West Africa’s most
stable regimes, can disintegrate into chaos almost overnight?
Part of it is that China, to fuel its soaring economy, is
willing to get along with just about anyone in power. They’re not out to
organize coups, overthrow regimes or impose their views.
And in much of West Africa, at least, they’ve probably been bolstered
by the thought that, when the chips were down, highly trained and equipped
French and American troops would help keep chaos at bay. Indeed, the Pentagon is
building small, discrete bases—known as lily-pads--across the continent, and
has also assigned more than three American thousand troops to work with and
train African solders to deal with “terrorist” threats, like the one that’s
just exploded in Mali.
If the presence of those foreign troops ultimately rubs the
native population the wrong way, due to anything from cultural differences to
civilian deaths in collateral damage, it’s the French and/or Americans and
their African military allies who will have to take the heat.
Without any of their own boots on the ground, without helicopter
gun ships or drones in the air, and not a single base outside of China, it won’t
be the Chinese.
That’s how it’s been in many other parts of the world,
particularly the Middle East: the Chinese have had a free ride, with the U.S.
and its allies patrolling key trade routes, intervening in the name of
political stability.
At least, that’s the way it was. But with the French and
other NATO countries more reluctant to intervene than ever, and with the U.S.
military facing major budget cuts, the day will soon come when China will have
to pick to pick up its own security tab, protect its own trade routes, become
at least one of the cops on the global beat.
China’s leaders may know that. Which is part of the reason
for their on-going military build up, particularly the navy. They’ve already
made a deal to train Afghan soldiers, for instance, now that the U.S. is
pulling out.
That may all make a lot of sense—from China’s view.
But how on earth will the U.S. adapt?
No comments:
Post a Comment